[Yanel-dev] deployment

simon simon at 333.ch
Mon Feb 6 09:34:37 CET 2012


Am 06.02.2012 09:29, schrieb Michael Wechner:
> Am 18.01.12 17:46, schrieb simon:
>> Am 18.01.2012 10:32, schrieb Michael Wechner:
>>> Hi Simon
>>>
>>> I can confirm what Balz is saying, whereas I would emphasize that it 
>>> is mostly about flexibility.
>>>
>>> You can find some examples under "Deployment" of the documentation:
>>>
>>> http://www.yanel.org/en/documentation/index.html
>> i was just reading 
>> http://www.yanel.org/en/documentation/how-to-add-ssl-to-apache-httpd.html 
>> and it seems to be a bit outdated , at least if you use an recent 
>> linux distro where apache above 2.2.13.  is bundled.
>> then  just enter
>>
>> apt-get install apache2
>>
>> sudo a2enmod proxy
>> sudo a2enmod proxy_http
>
> I have update now
>
> http://www.yanel.org/en/documentation/deployment-with-a-reverse-proxy.html
>
> accordingly.
thanks very much.

simon
>
> Thanks
>
> Michael
>>
>> HTH
>> simon
>>
>>>
>>> whereas I just realize that we need to replace the svn links by git.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> Am 18.01.12 10:19, schrieb basZero:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> in larger enterprise setups there is always a web server in front 
>>>> of the application server (tomcat, glassfish, etc.).
>>>> there are many advantages for having a web server in front of the 
>>>> app server:
>>>> - you can scale better (with plugins like mod_jk or alike you can 
>>>> distribute the load over N application servers. Of course, the 
>>>> plugin must support session stickyness, so that request with the 
>>>> same session cookie gets forwarded to the same app server.
>>>> - you can serve static content from the web server. this way you 
>>>> have much less "noise" on the app server. Of course: web server 
>>>> must have access to the content, so the deployment model might look 
>>>> different, if web and appserver are on physically different machines
>>>> - you can easily switch to a static maintenance page: you configure 
>>>> the web server to show a certain page. during this time, you can 
>>>> modify the app servers in the back end. if done, you can go back to 
>>>> the normal configuration where requests are routed to the app servers
>>>> - for highly secure applications, it's probably a must to introduce 
>>>> a web server, as you can much better protect your app server from 
>>>> unwanted requests (see for instance "perimeter authentication")
>>>>
>>>> downside of it is:
>>>> - you have more infrastructure to maintain
>>>> - more complex monitoring setup
>>>> - more expensive
>>>> - more complex support demand (if something goes wrong, you have to 
>>>> analyze more)
>>>>
>>>> cheers
>>>> balz
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:10 AM, simon <simon at 333.ch 
>>>> <mailto:simon at 333.ch>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     hi all
>>>>
>>>>     just wondering why yanel resp. tomcat is mostly deployed behind
>>>>     an apache?
>>>>     what's the reason and does someone has experience in using the
>>>>     tomcat without an apache web server in front?
>>>>
>>>>     cheers
>>>>     simon
>>>>     -- 
>>>>     Yanel-development mailing list Yanel-development at wyona.com
>>>>     <mailto:Yanel-development at wyona.com>
>>>>     http://lists.wyona.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yanel-development
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wyona.org/pipermail/yanel-development/attachments/20120206/d07a0ffa/attachment.html>


More information about the Yanel-development mailing list