[Yanel-dev] HOW TO KILL AN OSGI PROJECT - WITH 10 QUESTIONS

[basZero]

Here is the link for the JavaSE7 Event tomorrow:
http://www.jug.ch/html/events/2011/java_se.html

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:37 PM, basZero <baszero at gmail.com> wrote:

> It is certainly worth to get into the modularity details of Java SE7, which
> has been launched last week. Maybe that covers already a bunch of Yanel
> requirements...
>
> btw: tomorrow at Technopark Zurich is a JUGS JavaSE7 Launch Event, I'll go
> there definitely.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Michael Wechner <
> michael.wechner at wyona.com> wrote:
>
>> Am 12.07.11 21:55, schrieb basZero:
>>
>>  fyi
>>>
>>> a bit of reading, other thoughts, some stimuli to maybe judge whether
>>> OSGi is really something for Yanel...
>>> http://www.adam-bien.com/**roller/abien/entry/how_to_**kill_an_osgi<http://www.adam-bien.com/roller/abien/entry/how_to_kill_an_osgi>
>>>
>>
>> I think the principles of OSGi are definitely for Yanel, whereas I think
>> this is nicely expressed by Stefan Bohm's comment:
>>
>> "OSGi because it forces us to consider design-aspects such as modularity,
>> life-cycle management and versioning (which is not a bad thing ;-). On the
>> other hand, I don't think that dynamicity is really a major driver for OSGi.
>> Quite the contrary, enterprise environments have to be stable and
>> deterministic."
>>
>> Also related to that:
>>
>> http://www.osgi.org/blog/2010/**01/backward-compatibility.html<http://www.osgi.org/blog/2010/01/backward-compatibility.html>
>>
>> By using versioned interfaces Yanel does enforce such principles, but the
>> problem I see is that Yanel's way
>> of doing it is not a "standard", whereas OSGi is a "standard" (or at least
>> one does consider it a standard), which means the learning curve for
>> developers and sitting on top of shoulders would help ;-)
>>
>> It's still not clear to me if OSGi is the right thing from a "technical"
>> point of view and what if there might come up something better than OSGi? I
>> think these are the questions we should ask ourselves additionally to the
>> ones mentioned in the link above.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Michael
>> --
>> Yanel-development mailing list Yanel-development at wyona.com
>> http://lists.wyona.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/yanel-**development<http://lists.wyona.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yanel-development>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wyona.org/pipermail/yanel-development/attachments/20110719/adcf6f6f/attachment.html>