[Yanel-dev] slf4j = log4j 2

[Rob Adamson]

On 5 February 2011 00:08, Michael Wechner <michael.wechner at wyona.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think the following article is very interesting
>
> http://ceki.blogspot.com/2010/05/forces-and-vulnerabilites-of-apache.html
>
> Also I think that we might want to consider switching to
>
> http://www.slf4j.org/index.html
>
> WDYT?

Yes, it is a good idea.  However, your subject line is misleading, as
slf4j is just a facade. You still have to provide an implementation.

I would suggest sticking with log4j as the implementation.

Avoid commons-logging though: it's completely broken.
http://jnassef.blogspot.com/2007/10/commons-logging-may-be-harmful-to-your.html
http://articles.qos.ch/classloader.html

Rob