[Yanel-dev] Re: [Dev] Maven repo dupes

[Mehmet Birgi]

ok, i'll have a look at it tomorrow


On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Michael Wechner
<michael.wechner at wyona.com>wrote:

> Mehmet Birgi wrote:
>
>> Thanks for all the feedback. As this is low priority, I might get back to
>> it later, but I will not pursue this issue at the moment.
>>
>
> I would like you to spend 15 minutes on this. Please give the debugging
> approach as I suggested a try and also please
> add a bugzilla entry, because these ambiguities can lead to problems and
> hence we better get it documented it at least.
>
> Thanks
>
> Michi
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Memo
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/3/31 Guillaume D=E9flache <guillaume.deflache at wyona.com <mailto:
>> guillaume.deflache at wyona.com>>
>>
>>
>>    [This message just came on one internal Wyona mailing-lists,
>>    answering it here as it is of general interest: ]
>>
>>    Mehmet Birgi schrieb:
>>
>>    > Yesterday, while we were looking for the jakarta-commons-io lib
>>    to use, Guillaume noticed that this library is included twice,
>>    namely in:
>>    >
>>    >
>>
>>  /Users/memo/.m2/repository/apache-jakarta-commons/apache-jakarta-common=
s-io/1.2/apache-jakarta-commons-io-1.2.jar
>>    >
>>    /Users/memo/.m2/repository/commons-io/commons-io/1.2/commons-io-1.2.j=
ar
>>
>>    I previously found a statement in the jakarta-commons mailing-list
>>    about what is the now recommended form (I do not really remember
>>    which one so I won't risk a guess) and a rationale for it, I'll
>>    try to dig it up at home.
>>
>>
>>
>>    > As they are both the same version, one of them should be enough.
>>    There may be other dupes, we didn't search for them. The bug
>>    http://bugzilla.wyona.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D7006
>>    also seems to be remotely related to this. Would it be worth the
>>    effort to
>>
>>    It is indeed related to this. The cleanup explained below is made
>>    as part of
>>    http://bugzilla.wyona.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D6896
>>
>>
>>
>>    > try to clean out the maven repository? Or should I just enter a
>>    new P2
>>
>>    To sum it up is not really our or Maven's central repositories
>>    that are "dirty", it's rather the dependencies metadata that do
>>    not cater for renames of the groupId/artifactId couples during the
>>    life of a library.
>>    Cleaning that would probably remove all "duplicate librairies",
>>    but it is a long term task and not a very high priority ATM I think.
>>
>>
>>
>>    > bug and "forget about it" for now?
>>
>>    No need to enter another bug.
>>    You can forget about it for now as an application developer as the
>>    only real way to try to fix this is to clean up the dependency
>>    tree starting from its "leaves".
>>    For now only wyona-commons has been cleaned up (see r45585 on
>>    <http://svn.wyona.com/repos/public/>), next target up the tree is
>>    yarep.
>>    I had already started on that so please coordinate with us on this
>>    list if you want to work on that.
>>
>>
>>    HTH,
>>      Guillaume
>>    --     Yanel-development mailing list Yanel-development at wyona.com
>>    <mailto:Yanel-development at wyona.com>
>>
>>    http://lists.wyona.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yanel-development
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mehmet Birgi
>> www.wyona.com <http://www.wyona.com>
>>
>>
> --
> Yanel-development mailing list Yanel-development at wyona.com
> http://lists.wyona.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yanel-development
>



-- =

Mehmet Birgi
www.wyona.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wyona.org/pipermail/yanel-development/attachments/2010033=
1/ea9dfc6d/attachment.htm