[Yanel-dev] "image" resource type status (and "contributions" directories)?

[simon litwan]

Guillaume Déflache schrieb:
> Michael Wechner schrieb:
>> Guillaume Déflache schrieb:
>>> [...]
>>> As a matter of fact I am not sure what the difference is in intent and
>>> purpose between:
>>> - /public/yanel/trunk/src/realms & /public/yanel/trunk/src/resources
>>> - /public/yanel/trunk/src/contributions/ (only "resources"
>>> and no "realms" there)
>>
>> I think historically it was to show that resources can be at 
>> different locations and to show how to configure such cases
>
> I guess that this is nowadays covered by:
>   <resource-type
> src="@YANEL_SRC_DIR@/src/realms/welcome-admin/yanel/resources/show-realms/" 
>
>                 compile="true"/>
>   <resource-type
> src="@YANEL_SRC_DIR@/src/realms/welcome-admin/yanel/resources/update-webapp/" 
>
>                 compile="true"/>
> ...isn't it?
>
> Maybe we could move "src/contributions/resources" to
> "src/resources-webapp" or even "src/webapp/resources"???
> (Then we should move "src/resources" to "src/resources-core" or even
> "src/core/resources", and ditto for realms.)
> ((Probably would require to update a lot of documentation, configuration
> and maybe also code then...))
>
>
> Also should we use the term "resources" everywhere or really "resource 
> types"? (Resources brings confusion with HTTP resources IMHO.)
i think resource-type is clearer.

simon
>
>
>>> - /public/yanel/contributions/ (non-Apache licensed stuff for sure has
>>> to go there)
>>
>> this is code, which is not used by the "core" or "webapp", but makes 
>> sense for third party
>>> I could not find documentation explaining this: maybe we should add
>>> some? A README.txt file in each of these directories would do just fine
>>> IMHO.
>>
>> agreed
>
> Waiting for some feeback about what was written before writing these!