[Osr-101] Relative paths in url attribute of open, save, etc.

[Andreas Wuest]

Hi

On 1.2.2007 13:32 Uhr, Michael Wechner wrote:

> Thomas Comiotto wrote:
> 
>> Hi Andi,
>>
>>
>>> resolved relatively to the URI of the document against which the  
>>> introspection object is linked.
>>>
>>
>> IMO it would be more intuitive to consider the introspection document  
>> URI as baseURI.
> 
> agreed

I wholeheartedly agree with that! So, let's mention this in the spec, 
and I will fix Yulup to adhere to that.

>>> But there is a special case: what about an empty "url" attribute,  
>>> i.e. e.g.
>>>
>>> <open url=""/>
>>>
>>> At the moment, this is treated by Yulup as an invalid value.
>>>
>>> Is this ok?
>>
>> Not if you want to open the introspection file for editing:)
> 
> how to browsers handle <a href="">...</a>?
> 
> Is there a common ground? If so we should adopt it I think.

A link <a href="">foo</a> points to back to the URI of the document in 
which this element is contained.

Should we adopt this behaviour?

-- 
Kind regards,
Andi